![]() Linus Torvalds once expressed something similar - user actions are the highest-priority request on a desktop operating system. ![]() and then queue the fractions of a second of task it takes to do, rather than "wait". you make it show they clicked it IMMEDIATELY. If they are clicking on a Stop button - that takes 100% absolute priority over the process they are trying to stop. If they click on a button, make that button perform the action. The user gives you the orders, carry them out. Your poor session control is no excuse for breaking the user's browser functions.Ī rule that *every* UI I've ever used breaks: Your poor design is no reason to ignore the user or fudge with their entries (because they may want to go back BEYOND your site to the search they had up before and messing with that just hinders the user. Google Docs can save my form on the fly with no effort - to the standard of outperforming Office auto-save on a local machine. With HTML5 and modern scripting, there is absolutely no reason for it. your "protection" against such things is fake if you're just trying to fudge with the user's back button - a rogue party could easily resubmit their form another way and overwhelm your system with duplicate orders, etc.). Session control is not optional, especially when someone *actually* being able to use the back button can duplicate the form (i.e. If they can't handle double-entry of forms by checking for a previous submission with a unique token, they are idiotic. ![]() There is absolute no reason for a website to hijack a back button. Vivaldi is best for nerds, researchers and people that know what they are doing, rather than stroppy kids.ĭo you have anything to contribute to the article topic ? If you think you can build a top-flight browser from scratch in 2019 you need a reality check. This is a common "feature" of the modern world of software, get over it. WhatsApp oh dear, 1 (admittedly major) feature has been broken between updates. 1 optional GUI enhancement that was easy to add is hardly all kinds of nonsense, and oooh now there is Razer support so make that 2. "all kinds of Phillips hue colour nonsense". It is not a core browser component so has different priorities You are mistaking Chromium core for Chrome browser.Įmail is coming and being tested internally. This affects the browser how ?ĭrag-n-drop of bookmarks works just fine or the manager page would be rather pointless. Whop-de-do they changed the icon several times (so have the other browsers). Sorry, but they can try to grab all the free publicity they like - they have made an average Chromium clone which they barely manage.Ĭompanies don't drop everything for 1 individual that can't use the browser properly. ![]() ![]() Vivaldi basically did *exactly* the same, despite supposedly being the alternative "old Opera". The weird thing is, Vivaldi was born out of distaste with Opera which after v12 went Chrome too and stripped out all the interesting bits. just like the promised-and-then-years-later-ignored email client portion of Opera you were going to replicate. You still can't drag/drop arrange bookmarks (and it took years to get to the point where you could drag/drop bookmarks at all.īut, hey, yeah, you're gonna change the Internet with this new feature. They've changed the program icon 4 times. All kinds of "Philip Hue colour" nonsense. It's literally just Chrome with slightly different menus. Vivaldi are an absolute, 100% complete disappointment. They literally won't do anything, and haven't released an update in weeks despite acknowledging that new problem within hours of the last release. In fact, currently it's "Chrome that doesn't work for WhatsApp Web because we can't be bothered to revert the changes made in the last version". Yeah, like all the other things they were going to do with it to make it "like Opera". ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |